mudcat.org: BS: Copyright on Silence
Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafeawe

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2]


BS: Copyright on Silence

Related threads:
Song mentioning 'Facebook'.... Legal ? (12)
'Public Domain' in Canada (6)
(origins) Origins: Trad. Songs: Trad. or Copyrighted? (34)
Who gets credit for writing a song (18)
LEGALITY of using published melody (7)
Help! Copyright and me! (10)
Sonny Bono Copyright Extension (113) (closed)
Help: Copyright? help (33)
protecting your use of a pen name (23)
Woody on copyright (34)
How to Copyright ? (9)
copyrights (29)
Copyright Database/Details (7)
How to check out a copyright (27)
Tech: How do you register song copyright? (34)
Traditional music and copyright (38)
Looking for site to check copyright date (7)
New Copyright Philosophy - Maybe (3)
Copyrights on Spirituals (8)
Copyright (19)
How to Copyright (37)
Music and Copyright (5)
Tech: Let talk copywright (7)
copyright on manuscripts. (28)
(origins) Origins: Trad. or copyright (10)
Trad songs and copyright issues (4)
Origins: Copyright (5)
mudcat copyright (24)
Music Police After Doctors (30)
Steering Clear of Copyright cops (7)
Copyright petition (2)
HELP: Personal Website Copyright Issues (21)
are translations copyrighted? (4)
BS: Anyone in contact with Steve Sedburry? (4)
BS: Help 'Intellectual' copyright? (16)
copyright info--Deeper Well (3)
(origins) Origins: Copyrights (7)
Copyright Extens.Case @ SCOTUS 10/9/02 (25)
Copyright Question on 'sound bites' (3)
The Purpose of Copyright (76)
Copyright & the Internet-Some News (2)
Help: Public Domain or Copyrighted??? (40)
Help: Quoting a copyrighted song - OK to do? (12)
Help: Artwork copyright in USA (9)
BS: State copyright laws (30) (closed)
US Copyright office question (8)
Copyright registry? (7)
copyright (2)
Copyright/Public Domain ??? (3)
Copyright/publishing questions (12)
Small Victory in Copyright War (20)
Int'l Folklore Copyrights & Ethics (17)
Help: Copyrighting songs in the UK (15)
COPYRIGHT ??? (13)
Help: Copyright: to incorporate or not? (10)
Copyrights on 'older' songs...? (13)
copyright (6)
Copyright thugs (26)
Copyright research companies? (9)
More Copyright Stuff (1)
Help: copyright (13)
Musical Arrangement Copyright? (prev title Guest) (11)
Copyright Infringements (9)
copyright (8)
Help: Copyright-How do you know who has it? (3)
half a copyright question (4)
copyright - Burning Times (10)
Help: copyright help (5)
Help: Musical copyright and Public domain (2)
Help: Copyright rules (9)
Copyright Question (10)
Help: copyright question (3)
Help: ASCAP, copyright question (9)
BS: Copyright and folk (48) (closed)
Mudcat Copyright Policy? (9)
Writers, Artists, Composers - copyright (5)
Help: Copyright question (3)
Help: Using copyrighted Real Audio on web pag (2)
Help: Copyright List for songs (3)
Copyrights and traditional tunes (14)
'Should auld copyrights be forgot ?' (54)
Copyright query Curly Fletcher's ballads (7)
copyright issue (2)
copyright dates - help! (27)
Help: Copyright Restrictions..What are they? (4)
The copyright police (53)
Help: Copyright Restrictions..What are they? (4)
Copyright vs. patents (5)
NEED INFO - Copyright or Public Domain? (3)
How do I copyright a song (23)
Copyrights 101 (33)
Smalltime Copyright Rules ? (11)
Copyright question (pro & con) (22)
copyright site? (10)
Music Copyright Assault on Websites (17)


GUEST,Barry T 02 Jul 02 - 03:55 PM
GUEST 02 Jul 02 - 03:58 PM
Clinton Hammond 02 Jul 02 - 04:00 PM
MudGuard 02 Jul 02 - 04:04 PM
Naemanson 02 Jul 02 - 05:41 PM
Naemanson 02 Jul 02 - 05:43 PM
mousethief 02 Jul 02 - 06:05 PM
mousethief 02 Jul 02 - 06:06 PM
C-flat 02 Jul 02 - 06:12 PM
Stephen L. Rich 03 Jul 02 - 02:09 AM
Doug Chadwick 03 Jul 02 - 02:09 AM
katlaughing 03 Jul 02 - 02:29 AM
GUEST,ozmacca 03 Jul 02 - 02:38 AM
Bert 03 Jul 02 - 03:29 AM
C-flat 03 Jul 02 - 03:32 AM
Bert 03 Jul 02 - 03:35 AM
Hrothgar 03 Jul 02 - 05:08 AM
Nigel Parsons 03 Jul 02 - 05:13 AM
Nigel Parsons 03 Jul 02 - 06:31 AM
mooman 03 Jul 02 - 07:00 AM
mooman 03 Jul 02 - 07:01 AM
GUEST,T-boy 03 Jul 02 - 07:59 AM
CapriUni 03 Jul 02 - 08:41 AM
Wincing Devil 03 Jul 02 - 11:28 AM
MMario 03 Jul 02 - 11:41 AM
Bardford 03 Jul 02 - 12:06 PM
C-flat 03 Jul 02 - 12:13 PM
GUEST,Ernest C 03 Jul 02 - 12:40 PM
Noreen 03 Jul 02 - 12:57 PM
catspaw49 03 Jul 02 - 01:16 PM
Bardford 03 Jul 02 - 01:40 PM
C-flat 03 Jul 02 - 01:54 PM
EBarnacle1 03 Jul 02 - 02:42 PM
GUEST,Just Amy 03 Jul 02 - 02:56 PM
EBarnacle1 03 Jul 02 - 03:23 PM
Catherine Jayne 03 Jul 02 - 05:44 PM
Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull 03 Jul 02 - 05:52 PM
Bradypus 03 Jul 02 - 06:15 PM
Penny S. 03 Jul 02 - 06:25 PM
McGrath of Harlow 03 Jul 02 - 07:29 PM
little john cameron 03 Jul 02 - 08:06 PM
GUEST,Sonja 03 Jul 02 - 10:49 PM
Liz the Squeak 17 Jul 02 - 02:58 AM
Dave Bryant 17 Jul 02 - 05:55 AM
CapriUni 17 Jul 02 - 08:09 AM
GUEST,ozmacca 17 Jul 02 - 06:28 PM
Liz the Squeak 17 Jul 02 - 06:31 PM
Dave Bryant 18 Jul 02 - 05:42 AM
EBarnacle1 18 Jul 02 - 10:35 AM
Liz the Squeak 18 Jul 02 - 11:59 PM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:










Subject: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,Barry T
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 03:55 PM

We've discussed copyright a hundred times here at the 'Cat, but this story takes the cake...

Music Publisher claims copyright on silence

Based on this logic, I hope you'll all honour my new one-note composition titled Concert C! LOL


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 03:58 PM

Quite absurd.

The only certainty is that some lawyers will get richer...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Clinton Hammond
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 04:00 PM

That's hillarious!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: MudGuard
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 04:04 PM

Be careful if you do NOT post!
I claim the copyright on "absence of text"

Similar to the copyright on silence which is the absence of sound...

MudGuard


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Naemanson
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 05:41 PM


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Naemanson
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 05:43 PM

I challenge you, Mudguard! LOL


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: mousethief
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 06:05 PM

How would you prove it's the SAME silence?

Alex


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: mousethief
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 06:06 PM

You know, so many classical composers incorporated silence into their works that I'd think Batt would have no problem proving "prior art."

Alex


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: C-flat
Date: 02 Jul 02 - 06:12 PM

Naemanson, I have posted the exact same absence of text on other threads and am frankly shocked to find you claiming this absence as your own!
This is a clear case of blatant plagiarism and you will be hearing from my lawyers!
C-flat(pat.pending)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Stephen L. Rich
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:09 AM

As the uncle for whom I was named used to say,"The Universe is an incredibley stupid place in which to live!"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:09 AM

How do you know it's one silence? It could be two short silences joined together


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: katlaughing
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:29 AM

I think the publisher and Cage, when he was alive, should have copyrighted the absence of a brain! I never could stand his pretentious crap, anyway.

Do you suppose they will now go after any group that calls for a "Moment of Silence?" Or, maybe WE should copyright that, quick!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,ozmacca
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:38 AM

... or would it be just the first (or other) part of the same very long silence broken into two or more parts by onr or more periods of noise..... Anyway, what I want to patent is the deliberately inadvertant wrong note - as opposed to the deliberate wrong note or inadvertant wrong note, or even the inadvertant deliberate wrong note, which is so often featured in much flok music.

Having just read this, I think I might also try to patent the inadvertant mis-spelt word....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Bert
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 03:29 AM

There's just gotta be a song challenge here!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: C-flat
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 03:32 AM

Here's some lyrics,

"......................................................................................................................................................................................."
I only got the first verse, maybe someone else can pick it up?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Bert
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 03:35 AM

And didn't our own Seamus Kennedy have some silence for his narcoleptic pig in "Old MacDonald's Deformed Farm"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Hrothgar
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 05:08 AM

Stuck his neck out with the attribution, didn't he?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 05:13 AM

I think The British Legion should claim prior rights, on the basis of one (or two) minutes silence being an announced feature of November 11th since the end of WWI .
As to a song challenge, it's too late. "Hello darkness my old friend..."

Nigel


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 06:31 AM

IIRC somebody recorded a 'single' which was just silence. It was included on numerous Juke boxes and often selected just to get a break in the "Music"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: mooman
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 07:00 AM

Ohmygod! I've infringed copyright!

mooman


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: mooman
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 07:01 AM

Oh no it's alright! The post got through...

mooman


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,T-boy
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 07:59 AM

Didn't John Lennon once do a 'two minutes silence' on one of his albums? Maybe Yoko should cough up some royalties too.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: CapriUni
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 08:41 AM

Obviously, Batt's composition is very different.

First off, Cage wrote in 4/4 time; the score of the first 5 bars are (all rests):

Whole Note
Whole note
Quarter note, eighth note, eighth note, half note
Whole note
Whole note

But Batt's composition, although it is also written entirely with rests, is clearly in 3/4 time, and begins:

Quarter note, eighth note, quarter note, eighth note
Dotted half
eighth note, eighth note, half
eighth note, eighth note, quarter, quarter Dotted half

How the lawyers could confust the two is beyond me!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Wincing Devil
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 11:28 AM

I'm reminded of an old Batman TV episode in which the Joker claimed a copyright on the alphabet...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: MMario
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 11:41 AM

c-flat.

Please! Punctuation!

That should have read...

"...............,.............;
................,..............
................,........................,
.............,...............,........................;
.............,....................!"

I believe the second verse is:

"...............,.............
................,..............;
................,........................
.............,...............!........................:
.............,....................!"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Bardford
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 12:06 PM

The CBC interviewed Batt on Monday night. A couple of points- he registered the composition as co-written by Batt/Cage, but it was Clint Cage who was the collaborator, not John. (Clint Cage=Batt, of course.)

Also, Batt pointed out that Cage's piece was an analog recording, whilst his was digital. They played an excerpt from Batt's piece, but I didn't hear it as I had turned my radio down.

Frankly, I would like to see Milli Vanilli perform either of the pieces, maybe with Marcel Marceau.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: C-flat
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 12:13 PM

Apologies MMario, As usual I got carried away with the lyrical flow and missed the punctuation.
Here's a bunch to add in where appropriate,
("!,?;.`:")


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,Ernest C
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 12:40 PM

On Rhymes and Reasons, John Denver sang "The Ballad of Spiro Agnew" (Tom Paxton) "I'll sing you a song of Spiro Agnew, and all the things he's done.", followed by an appropriate silence. Then he did "The Ballad of Richard Nixon" which was just seven seconds of silence.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Noreen
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 12:57 PM

Thanks for putting the line breaks in, MMario...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: catspaw49
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 01:16 PM

Let me get the copyright on gaseous efflusive flatulence. My ass is a wind instrument and a fart is a whole note.........

BBRRAAAWWWMMPP



Copyright that!

Spaw


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Bardford
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 01:40 PM

Uh, Spaw, shouldn't that be hole note?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: C-flat
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 01:54 PM

Was that the opening line of "Blowing in the wind"?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: EBarnacle1
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:42 PM

You cannot copyright on punctuation. The estate of Victor Borge will get into the act.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,Just Amy
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 02:56 PM

ROTFLMAO ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: EBarnacle1
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 03:23 PM

whatever that means


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Catherine Jayne
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 05:44 PM

EBarnacle, I think what Just Amy means is "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Arse Off!!!) I agree with her this has provided me with an evening full of chuckles........you can't copyright chuckling.......can you???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 05:52 PM

i think they are taking the piss.john


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Bradypus
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 06:15 PM

Mike Batt's 'One minute silence' is a musical joke. It's a much better joke tan 4'33", but mostly because 4'33" got there first. When I first saw the Planets album, the Batt / Cage attribution had me laughing out loud. (and not because of images of vampires behind bars).It seems to me that Cage certainly contributes to the effectiveness of the work.

Perhaps they could come to an agreement based on royalties for the number of notes played ...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Penny S.
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 06:25 PM

George Fox and the Seekers - 1652 have some claim to precede Cage. Silence must therefore be in the public domain.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 07:29 PM

Silent orders of monks - notably Cistercians and Carthusians, got in there long before the Quakers. (The difference being that the main time the Silent Orders break their silence is in church, while the only time some Friends hold their tongues is in Meeting.)

Maybe there could be a CD put out some time as an enumenical gesture. One side would be a Carthusian or Cistercian silence, and the other would be a Quaker silence.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: little john cameron
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 08:06 PM

CBC interview HERE


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,Sonja
Date: 03 Jul 02 - 10:49 PM

LOL, Capri!
 
 

Aw, Spaw, I wanted to take out the copyright on farting, but ya beat me to it.  OK, I'll just copyright not farting!
 

Sonja

~SWO~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 17 Jul 02 - 02:58 AM

Spaw, you've copyrighted the huge botty trumpets, what about the girly little poots? Can I have them??

LTS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Dave Bryant
Date: 17 Jul 02 - 05:55 AM

Liz - you can hardly claim to have a little Botty.

Why don't we start playing 4' 33" in music sessions - we could play it like "Speed the Plough" and get faster and faster - I wonder just how short we could make the last one ?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: CapriUni
Date: 17 Jul 02 - 08:09 AM

Besides, isn't a Botty Trumpet an instrument, just the same as a regular brass trumpet?

I figure, you can copyright a tune played on and instrument, but not the instrument itself.

(Especially if everyone has one. Doesn't matter if they choose not to play it.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: GUEST,ozmacca
Date: 17 Jul 02 - 06:28 PM

However, you could patent a new device to be used with an existing commonly available apparatus, such as a revolutionary new concept of mouthpiece, for example...... Hmmm - No, come to think of it, forget I spoke..........


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 17 Jul 02 - 06:31 PM

Did I say I had a little botty? No. I said, can I have the girly poots?

Obviously, after the vegeburgers for supper, this is not possible. Spaw, I'm sorry, I've infringed your copyright.... when would you like to collect?

As for the 'revolutionary new concept of mouthpiece, for example' - ever tried farting through a thong? Bit like that thing some people can do with their thumbs and a blade of grass.....

LTS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Dave Bryant
Date: 18 Jul 02 - 05:42 AM

Without getting too personal, Liz, most instruments go down in pitch as they increase in size. I would therefore think that you've got a bass base - and "poots" are defintely scored in the treble clef. By the time you've had the vegeburgers I would also expect a powerful fortissimo - I hope that poor thong has carbon fibre or tungsten steel reinforcements - perhaps it's that which produces the higher overtones.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: EBarnacle1
Date: 18 Jul 02 - 10:35 AM

This opens up a whole new field of music as long as you copyright it first. Consider pressing one note on a key-board and letting the electrical system vary the intensity at 60 cycles. It could be called the music of the cosmos, or at least ConEd.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Copyright on Silence
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 18 Jul 02 - 11:59 PM

Dave - in the strident tones of Brian's mother "how much more personal can you get?" The size of the container does not always correspond with the size of the opening.... Big bottles have the same size mouths as little bottles...... understand whatI'm getting at here?

If you go the Science Museum (UK) there is an exhibition on at the moment called 'Grossology' which will explain why we get girly toots and Spaw-like braaarmps. This is possibly the only genuine case where size really doesn't matter.

LTS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 5 December 2:44 PM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.