mudcat.org: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafeawe

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2]


BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home

SINSULL 20 Apr 10 - 03:48 PM
GUEST,Peter Laban 20 Apr 10 - 03:39 PM
JohnInKansas 23 Feb 10 - 07:32 PM
CarolC 23 Feb 10 - 07:22 PM
SINSULL 23 Feb 10 - 07:04 PM
CarolC 23 Feb 10 - 05:55 PM
SINSULL 23 Feb 10 - 04:54 PM
SINSULL 23 Feb 10 - 04:50 PM
JohnInKansas 22 Feb 10 - 10:20 PM
CarolC 22 Feb 10 - 09:24 PM
Don(Wyziwyg)T 22 Feb 10 - 09:12 PM
SINSULL 22 Feb 10 - 11:34 AM
kendall 22 Feb 10 - 04:23 AM
CarolC 22 Feb 10 - 01:51 AM
JohnInKansas 22 Feb 10 - 01:34 AM
Melissa 21 Feb 10 - 08:24 PM
CarolC 21 Feb 10 - 08:20 PM
mousethief 21 Feb 10 - 08:10 PM
JohnInKansas 21 Feb 10 - 08:05 PM
CarolC 21 Feb 10 - 08:02 PM
mousethief 21 Feb 10 - 07:30 PM
Rowan 21 Feb 10 - 05:19 PM
CarolC 21 Feb 10 - 01:26 PM
CarolC 21 Feb 10 - 01:23 PM
SINSULL 21 Feb 10 - 01:04 PM
kendall 21 Feb 10 - 11:24 AM
SINSULL 21 Feb 10 - 11:15 AM
Charley Noble 21 Feb 10 - 10:50 AM
Richard Bridge 21 Feb 10 - 08:08 AM
beardedbruce 21 Feb 10 - 07:53 AM
kendall 21 Feb 10 - 06:59 AM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 05:22 PM
kendall 20 Feb 10 - 05:20 PM
JohnInKansas 20 Feb 10 - 04:38 PM
GUEST,999 20 Feb 10 - 02:45 PM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 02:42 PM
Don Firth 20 Feb 10 - 02:20 PM
Charley Noble 20 Feb 10 - 01:46 PM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 01:24 PM
Charley Noble 20 Feb 10 - 01:05 PM
Charley Noble 20 Feb 10 - 12:50 PM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 12:35 PM
Charley Noble 20 Feb 10 - 12:21 PM
VirginiaTam 20 Feb 10 - 11:18 AM
kendall 20 Feb 10 - 09:25 AM
beardedbruce 20 Feb 10 - 09:00 AM
JohnInKansas 20 Feb 10 - 12:57 AM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 12:22 AM
CarolC 20 Feb 10 - 12:13 AM
Amergin 19 Feb 10 - 11:58 PM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:






Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 20 Apr 10 - 03:48 PM

In one email, when an IT person commented on how the viewing of the webcam pictures and screen shots from a student's computer was like a "little LMSD (Lower Merion School District) soap opera", she (the school administrator)allegedly replied: "I know, I love it."

I see millions of dollars in some kids' futures. Hope they use it to go to college and become IT professionals.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: GUEST,Peter Laban
Date: 20 Apr 10 - 03:39 PM

In an interesting turn to this case it now emerges a total of 56000 images were taken of students through the laptop scheme.

Article


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 07:32 PM

Sinsul's link is the first I've seen confirming that the laptops were Macs. Obviously the school board has low expectations for student performance and superficial regard for their talents, as well as a defective and deficient understanding of technology.



John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 07:22 PM

My experience has been that schools often don't like parents who advocate for their children, and will often take out their anger at parents' advocacy for their children on the children themselves, turning them into targets of belittlement and ridicule. The behavior of these particular school administrators is very much of that sort.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 07:04 PM

A co-worker recently met with her son's teacher about some petty BS and was saying she felt silly about it but it was important to her sone. I observed that it was always best to make it known that you were aware of everything that went on in the classroom. First, you get more respect from teachers who are used to dealing with apathetic parebts. Second, it is good for them to know you will not back off if you feel you are right.
Always worked for me.
Unfortunately, some teachers and administrators assume they have a free hand in dealing a child. And crap like this happens.
Although it seems these are involved parents. Good for them.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 05:55 PM

Not at all surprising to me that the school system would belittle the victims of their bad behavior rather than own up to it themselves. We need a lot more accountability from our school administrators than we currently demand.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 04:54 PM

The FBI, the ACLU, the District Attorney, the Police - all are on board to investigate if any laws were broken. The company that manufactures the software (they make LoJack) are disabling the system. Wonder who else has been "watched"? This will get very ugly very fast.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 23 Feb 10 - 04:50 PM

A federal judge has ordered the District to cease activating the cameras, preserve all photos taken and turn them over to a forensic expert who will examine the evidence and report to the court.
The school has been ordered to present all bulletins to students and parents to the court a minimum of six hours before distributing them and to cease all PA announcements denying the charges and belittling the plaintiffs.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9160878/Federal_judge_orders_Pa._schools_to_stop_laptop_spying

The tech sites are watching this closely. New laws may come out of it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 10:20 PM

would include "a loaner computer that, against regulations, might be taken off campus."

This does not say that students violated regulations that prohibted taking their assigned laptops off campus, and specifically does not say that the student who filed the suit was not authorized to take "his" computer home.

It implies that some computers might be loaned with a restriction, but doesn't say that the restriction applied to them all.

It would seem that clear speaking is no more a capability of the adminstrator(s) of the school than of the talking heads who report the "news."

The published policy specific to the computers loaned to the plaintiff student(s) - if one exists - is possibly of rather intrinsic importance to the case, and so far as I've seen no such policy has been revealed. People have spoken about "policies" that might exist (if only in the head of someone in the school administration?) but nobody says anything about "the policy on computers loaned to the (affected) students."

AND

Another article recently indicated that the school has been "asked" by the "plaintiff's lawyers" not to "wipe" all drives on the students' computers, lest it delete evidence essential to the case. There was a suggestion that the school had suggested they might recall all the loaners and "clean them" - (once again illustrating their clear logic and infallible efficiency).

It would seem to me to be more important that they not wipe the hard drives on faculty and administrator computers(?????), since they are the ones accused of possibly having illicit information on them, and the ones in possession of computers that might contain incriminating evidence.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 09:24 PM

It's possible to cover the lens or lens covering without placing anything with adhesive directly on the surface, Don, which is what I was talking about and I prefer to do because my experience with adhesives is that they often leave a film on surfaces to which they adhere. For instance, as I said above, a post-it-note that is adhered to the camera or computer just above, below, or to the side of the actual lens, and with the non-adhesive part covering the lens, would do the job just fine. Someone else suggested a bandaid, which would work also because the gauze part of the band-aid can be placed over the lens rather than any of the sticky part.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 09:12 PM

""Well, I wouldn't put any kind of adhesive on any clear surface through which I wanted to be able to see clearly.""

You would be perfectly justified in puting such tape over a lens through which somebody else was watching you, Carol.

I'd break the bloody lens, were it me or my child, that was the target.

Don T.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 11:34 AM

It's 4:30 in the morning. Why aren't you in bed? I will call Ratched if I have to.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: kendall
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 04:23 AM

John, I believe SECURE in this context refers to maybe being arrested.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 01:51 AM

Does give some scope for the imagination, though. You could use an image that is annoying but not controversial, like this maybe, or this.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 22 Feb 10 - 01:34 AM

Of course it's not something I'd likely ever have done when I was a wee one; but I can see a clever young person figuring out how to keep the webcam aimed, when not in use, at a "scene" (possibly a picture or a poster) that might be appropriately rude or in some way embarrassing to an admin type person who sneaked a peek.

Of course in today's PC world that would probably be considered insubordinate and the kid would get kicked out of school.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Melissa
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:24 PM

I guess if it was me, I'd put a bandaid over the camera..but not until I knew the damn thing was watching me.

How is this different from 'video voyeurism'?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:20 PM

Well, I wouldn't put any kind of adhesive on any clear surface through which I wanted to be able to see clearly.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: mousethief
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:10 PM

I doubt very much the actual lens is exposed. On my wife's PC, the camera is behind a sheet of plastic that is flush with the surface of the piece surrounding the screen. The lens surface itself is a couple of millimetres back from that.

O..O
=o=


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:05 PM

I do know that "privacy" does not appear in the constitution.

The "blanket" section of the U.S. Constitution probably most frequently cited is:

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:02 PM

I wouldn't put any adhesive directly on a camera lens. I've used tapes before that weren't ever supposed to leave a residue that did. And even electrical tape could leave a very thin residue that you might not see on the surface, but could cloud the lens.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: mousethief
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 07:30 PM

I wouldn't put duct tape over a webcam lens. Duct tape often leaves a residue. A post it note, with the glue part adhering to the camera just above, below, or to the side of the lens, and with the non-glue part covering the lens would be much less risky.

I think electricians tape would serve admirably. It has to be left for years to leave sticky residue.

O..O
=o=


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Rowan
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 05:19 PM

I suspect the Assistant Principal has some suspect principles.

Cheers, Rowan


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 01:26 PM

One further point - I notice the assistant principle didn't give him a hard time for taking the computer home, but only for what she thought was dealing drugs. So I don't think taking the computer home was against the school regulations.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 01:23 PM

I wouldn't put duct tape over a webcam lens. Duct tape often leaves a residue. A post it note, with the glue part adhering to the camera just above, below, or to the side of the lens, and with the non-glue part covering the lens would be much less risky.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 01:04 PM

Kendall,
There is a huge difference here in that the school was surreptitiously monitoring people's homes without their knowledge.   The school had no legal right to electronically invade these homes electronically.
A police officer can not enter your home without a warrant unless someone is clearly in danger.
But I still thin there is a lot more to this story that for now only the lawyers and the principle involved know.
Meantime - yet another use for duct tape. Block those webcams and microphones.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: kendall
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 11:24 AM

How about cops and so called "Bait cars". Is this so different? As usual, the lawyers will make out better than anyone else.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: SINSULL
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 11:15 AM

I am still amazed at her arrogance and stupidity. Has there been any info on how the young man was punished? Detention? Demerits?

A loaner computer taken off campus - is that considered a theft? And if so, legally, do they have the right to invade the family's privacy by activating a webcam? I see this being settled out of court. The assistant principle (based on what we have been told so far) should be fired. I doubt we have the full story.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Charley Noble
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 10:50 AM

bearderbruce-

"The Lower Merion School District, in response to a suit filed by a student, has acknowledged that webcams were remotely activated 42 times in the past 14 months, but only to find missing, lost or stolen laptops - which the district noted would include "a loaner computer that, against regulations, might be taken off campus."

That statement from the school district doesn't make much sense. Wouldn't it be normal that if the school district provided laptops to the students that they would be expected to take them "off-campus" to their homes?

And the school district is not addressing the allegation that their vice principle used the laptop in question to view a student consuming what appeared to her to be drugs, and taking a screen shot of him doing so. Was she authorized to do so; evidently not from other information released from the school district.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 08:08 AM

It would be possible to insert a consent to random activation in the EULA, but since the student would probably be a minor and the house "invaded" the house of his or her parents, I can see a feast for lawyers following...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: beardedbruce
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 07:53 AM

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100220/D9E04NVG0.html

"The Lower Merion School District, in response to a suit filed by a student, has acknowledged that webcams were remotely activated 42 times in the past 14 months, but only to find missing, lost or stolen laptops - which the district noted would include "a loaner computer that, against regulations, might be taken off campus.""

So the student violated the user agreement by taking the computer off campus?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: kendall
Date: 21 Feb 10 - 06:59 AM

When I get my head cleared up I will.As I said, I don't know what, if any laws have been broken. I do know that "privacy" does not appear in the constitution.

I keep thinking of Jimmy Durante and his personal philosophy: "Leave everyone one else alone."

It's a sad fact that we only need one rule, and it is golden.Problem is too many of us think our rules are the best or only ones worth a damn.

.. they're rioting in Africa, they're starving in Spain, there's hurricanes in Florida and Texas needs rain...etc.

the whole world is festering with unhappy souls,
The French hate the Germans, the Germans hate to Poles,
Italians hate Yugoslavs,
South Africans hate the Dutch,
And I don't like anybody very much.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 05:22 PM

Read the lawsuit, Kendall. It cites several laws that have been broken by the school system's behavior.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: kendall
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 05:20 PM

just because some act is despicable does not make it illegal. If it is illegal it is a written law but out outrage does not make it a law.

Right now I'm full of drugs for pain but I still remember some of what I learned in 18 years of law enforcement.However, I will bow to superior knowledge...if I see some.Ad that's not meant to be snotty.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 04:38 PM

Even given that the laptops were "school property" ownership does not grant an exemption to the laws cited in the lawsuit.

With extremely rare exceptions, you do not "own" any of the software installed on your computer. You MUST at the very least click on an "Accept" button to affirm that you have read and accept the terms of a EULA (End User License Agreement) to install almost all programs. Nearly all such EULAs assert (and you agree) that the software belongs to the person or company that provided it.

That alone does not give the owner any legal right to access your computer for any purpose, and specifically not for any of the purposes prohibited by the cited laws.

Even to get updates for protection against malware, you must sign up and affirm an agreement to a separate EULA specifically granting permission for the updater to access your computer for the specific purposes stated in the EULA. Quite a few programs may request that you give them a separate permission to access statistics on how you use their program, but doing so requires that you "sign" a separate EULA giving them permission to do so, and even that access is generally held to be ILLEGAL without your consent.

Some support groups may offer to "remotely control" your computer to fix problems; but each such access requires a separate permission by the user. They cannot legally "come back later" even to see if the fix remains in place.

When you rent a car, the car still belongs to the agency, but you must sign a Rental Agreement that usually includes terms and conditions such as not using it as a taxi for hire, not using it for drag racing, etc. The use you can make of it are limited only by the terms you agree to when you sign the agreement.

The school has admitted that they did not tell students that the webcam could be remotely activated, and did not obtain permission to do so while the the students were in possession of the laptops. No EULA means no agreement, and the access that evidently occured is prohibited by the cited regulations.

If and when a student informs them that a laptop is lost or stolen, a properly recorded notice that the laptop is not in the possession of the person to whom it was assigned might be sufficient to permit them to turn on the webcam remotely for purposes of locating the laptop; but so long as it remains in its proper place the use of the remote webcam function is bound by the regulations cited, modified only by prior agreements made with the one having possesion, and the existence of "informed consent" must be provable.

Most companies providing "locator" functions (that I've seen) consider the webcam a useless - and dangerous - frivolity, and rely on cell tower location (which requires a warrant or a prior recorded permission for the cell provider to release info) and/or GPS chips in the protected laptop. Because of the likelihood of "accidental violation of privacy laws" - as well as to prevent theft of information - the better systems securely lock - or delete - all information on a laptop if locater functions are remotely activated.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: GUEST,999
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 02:45 PM

"First the Lord made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made school boards." Twain

I expect the school will use 'loco parentis' as a defence. It will fail.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 02:42 PM

There's no way the students could have known that their cameras could be or might be operated remotely. Had the school informed them that this could and would be done, they could have covered the camera in some way. They were not informed, and they had no reason to anticipate the need to take such precautions.

And it wasn't what the students were doing with the computer that was being monitored. It was what the students were doing in their homes in the vicinity of the computers that was being monitored. It wasn't the computers that were being monitored. It was the students, via a camera, that were being monitored. There really is a very big difference between these two things. Monitoring the students without their knowledge via a camera placed in their homes, even if it's in a computer that they've brought into their homes themselves, is illegal. If it wasn't, the government would be able to put a camera in your house and use it without your knowledge and without a warrant, to spy on you. The government can't do that legally, and neither can a school system (which, in the case of a public school system, is the government).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Don Firth
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 02:20 PM

"You[r] computer can't get a virus if you never turn it on."

I think my suggestions are a bit more sophisticated than that, John. Unless the student has a reason to be using the webcam, unplugging it, or, if it's built into the screen, covering it, should solve the "Peeping Tom or Thomasina" problem. A well-placed piece of duct-tape can be quite sophisticated if used intelligently.

Whatever one is doing on a computer that's networked one way or another can be monitored unless secured against this sort of thing. Working on a document or surfing the web can be remotely monitored, of course. Many a company employee goofing around on a company computer has learned this the hard way.

Don Firth


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Charley Noble
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 01:46 PM

Carol-

Thanks! Here's the relevant quotes:

In the photos, the teen was allegedly holding two pill-shaped objects, says Robbins' attorney Mark Haltzman. School officials believed they were drugs, while the family maintains they were simply Mike-N-Ike candy.

"They were trying to allege that…those were pills and somehow he was involved in selling drugs," Halzman said Friday.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 01:24 PM

I found it when I clicked on the kid's name in the article you posted in your opening post, Charley. Here it is...

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/tech/WebcamGate-Teen-I-Hope-Theyre-Not-Watching-Me-84826357.html


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Charley Noble
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 01:05 PM

Here's a link to the actual complaint by the parents: click here for Complaint

Carol-

Could you provide a link to the story about "candy"? I can't seem to find any mention of that.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Charley Noble
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:50 PM

But was the "candy" dark chocolate?

This story still amazes me. And CNN just did an update for the lunch crowd.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:35 PM

It wasn't the computers that were being monitored. It was the students who were being monitored, beardedbruce and Kendall. Monitoring the computer would have been if they had looked at the contents of the computer, or monitored how the computer was being used. That's not what they were doing. They were using the computer like a surveillance camera to monitor the students themselves.

Unreasonable search applies as much to that as it would if a government used a camera in your house to spy on you without your knowledge or permission.

By the way, he wasn't masturbating. He was eating candy. The assistant principal thought he was dealing drugs. If the government used a camera (and that's what we are talking about - a camera) in your house to spy on you without a warrant, and without your knowledge and permission, regardless of their motivations, it would be illegal. It's no different for these school administrators.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Charley Noble
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:21 PM

Virginia Tam-

You raise an interesting point, one that focuses on what motive the administrator might have had. We've all been wondering, I'm sure.

However, even if the administrator had received a complaint about what the student was allegedly doing with the school laptop computer, she should have forwarded that complaint to the local legal authorities for follow-up, and the requisite warrant for monitoring the laptop in question.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: VirginiaTam
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 11:18 AM

hmmm.. unless the machine (which was school property) had been reported stolen or missing, there was no reason for the principal to track it by checking its whereabouts.

Another thing to consider though, is if the boy was using this school property for the purpose of self gratification and was actually posting his activity, what does that mean to the case?

If the school is monitoring websites accessed from remote machines then would that warrant activating the checking device as an abuse of school property?

Much more than meets the eye in this event. But at face value it seems unjustified and ludicrously intrusive.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: kendall
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 09:25 AM

Carol, the 4th amendment covers people and things, not pictures.I think it should be broadened, but right now there is no law I can see has been broken.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons houses papers and effects against UNREASONABLE search and seizure shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation stating in particular the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

I had that drilled into my head back in Treasury school. Maybe the Supreme court will expand it; after all, they say corporations are people, what next? The 9th amendment might offer some hope.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: beardedbruce
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 09:00 AM

"Accessing another person's computer without the knowledge and permission of the one in possession of the computer is ILLEGAL. "


True.

BUT who was the OWNER of these machines? IF they were school issued ( and property), there was no illegal act in monitoring them. If you use a radio, there is NO right to privacy by law- anyone may listen in. It does become illegal to SELL information gathered from listening to that radio, though.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:57 AM

FBI said to be probing Pa. webcam case

Will explore whether school district broke federal wiretap laws

By Maryclaire Dale
Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press
updated 3:44 p.m. CT, Fri., Feb. 19, 2010

PHILADELPHIA - A law-enforcement official with knowledge of the case says the FBI has opened a criminal investigation into a Pennsylvania school district accused of activating webcams inside students' homes without their knowledge.

The official, speaking to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity, says the FBI will explore whether Lower Merion School District officials broke any federal wiretap or computer-intrusion laws.

Lower Merion officials say they remotely activated webcams 42 times to find missing student laptops in the past 14 months, but never did so to spy on students, as a recent lawsuit claims.

The Montgomery County district attorney also is gathering information to determine whether to open an investigation.

John


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:22 AM

...and the one who took the pictures should have to register with the national sex offender registry.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Feb 10 - 12:13 AM

People shouldn't have to turn their computers off in order to keep their teachers and school administrators from spying on them in their homes. What these people did is against the law. They should go to jail. That would be more appropriate than suing the school system for a lot of money. After all, that money is taxpayer money that should be used to educate children.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: School Laptop Spies on Children at Home
From: Amergin
Date: 19 Feb 10 - 11:58 PM

If the administrator had been remotely searching the computer to see what websites and files the student placed on it, would have been one thing. these were school issued computers after all....but spying on them through the webcam, is completely different.

The computer could be turned off, but there are ways to turn it on remotely.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 28 February 3:13 PM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.